8 Rounds of Coffee @Boxwerk Munich

8 Rounds of Coffee @Boxwerk Munich
We have spent an day at the Boxwerk Munich and structured it after the format of a boxing match:

8 Rounds of Coffee -  Each with its own coffee theme.


This sounds like a concept. It was an experiment. And it made a few things about coffee visible that don't come across as clearly in a classic tasting.

Round 01 belonged to a question that is rarely discussed seriously in the specialty coffee world: Does milk ruin a good coffee? The answer we expected would have been a clear yes. The answer the evening produced was more nuanced.

A well-extracted espresso with whole milk is not a worse coffee. It is a different coffee. The milk does not simply mask flavors; it alters the texture, rounds off the acidity, and brings a sweetness into play that the coffee alone does not always possess. Whether that is desirable depends on the coffee. With a fruity, floral Ethiopian, you lose a lot. With a chocolaty Brazilian, you lose little and potentially gain something. The round ended without a winner. Just how this debate always ends.



Brewing methods, extraction, origin.

Rounds two to four dealt with brewing methods. We ran the same bean—a Colombian washed lot—through four different methods: V60, French Press, Aeropress, and Chemex. The result was more educational than any theory. The V60 emphasized clarity and fruitiness. The French Press brought more body but less definition. The Aeropress produced a concentration that almost approached espresso. The Chemex delivered the cleanest cup—with the least character.
None of the methods were wrong. But each comes with a different expectation. Those looking for clarity choose the V60. Those who want body choose the French Press. Those who want both and are willing to compromise choose the Aeropress. The Chemex is suited for coffees that can speak for themselves without needing support.


Round five was origin sparring: a naturally processed Brazilian with chocolate and nuts against an Ethiopian from the Guji zone, fruity, with a berry profile and big body. Both good. Both clearly viable. But hardly interchangeable. A Brazilian is an argument for the familiar, rich, and reliable. An Ethiopian is an argument for the complex, unexpected, and vibrant. The audience split. In equal parts.

 

Rounds six to eight dealt with extraction—with what happens when you pull the same bean for too short or too long, or grind it too coarse or too fine. This is the work behind every shot we serve in the café, which is invisible in the cup when it's done right. When it's not right, it's the only thing you taste.

 

What the evening left behind: Coffee is more precise than it seems and more generous than you think. There are very many ways to make it poorly. There are also very many ways to make it well. 
Back to blog